<i>Annals of Internal Medicine</i> at Age 75: Reflections on the Past 25 Years

History of Medicine2 July 2002Annals of Internal Medicine at Age 75: Reflections on the Past 25 YearsEdward J. Huth, MD and Kathleen Case, MSEdward J. Huth, MDSearch for more papers by this author and Kathleen Case, MSSearch for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-137-1-200207020-00010 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail In its first 75 years, Annals of Internal Medicine evolved from being primarily a vehicle for papers presented at the Annual Session of the American College of Physicians to a journal in which all manuscripts are peer reviewed and decisions to publish are based solely on the editor's view of which papers are most important. This evolution was described in detail in an article published for Annal's 50th anniversary (1). The story of the journal's first 50 years was also the story of the emergence of internal medicine as a discipline; the early Annals editors represented the specialties of the ...References1. Huth EJ, van Steenburgh KC. Annals of Internal Medicine: the first 50 years. Ann Intern Med. 1977;87:103-10. [PMID: 327884] LinkGoogle Scholar2. Pincoffs MC. Editorial. Ann Intern Med. 1933;6:1115-6. Google Scholar3. Clough PW. The relation of cigarette smoking to bronchogenic carcinoma. Ann Intern Med. 1957;46:187-96. LinkGoogle Scholar4. . The changing mores of biomedical research. A colloquium on ethical dilemmas form medical advances. Ann Intern Med. 1967;67 Suppl 7 3-83. Google Scholar5. Allyn R, Stearns NS. A library for Internists. Recommended by the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 1973;79:293-322. [PMID: 4726561] LinkGoogle Scholar6. Aronoff GR, Berns JS, Brier ME, Golper TA, Morrison G, Singer I, et al . Drug Prescribing in Renal Failure: Dosing Guidelines for Adults. 4th ed. Philadelphia: American Coll of Physicians; 1999. Google Scholar7. Eddy DM, ed. Common Screening Tests. Philadelphia: American Coll of Physicians; 1991. Google Scholar8. Mulrow C, Cook D, eds. Systematic Reviews. Synthesis of Best Evidence for Health Care Decisions. Philadelphia: American Coll of Physicians; 1998. Google Scholar9. Eddy DM. Screening for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med. 1989;111:389-99. [PMID: 2504094] LinkGoogle Scholar10. Garber AM, Browner WS, Hulley SB. Cholesterol screening in asymptomatic adults, revisited. Part 2. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:518-31. [PMID: 8602715] LinkGoogle Scholar11. Greenberger NJ, Davies NE, Maynard EP, Wallerstein RO, Hildreth EA, Clever LH. Universal access to health care in America: a moral and medical imperative [Editorial]. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112:637-9. [PMID: 2334078] LinkGoogle Scholar12. . American College of Physicians Ethics Manual. 4th ed. Philadelphia: American Coll of Physicians; 1998. Google Scholar13. Snyder L, Quill TE, eds. Physician's Guide to End-of-Life Care. Philadelphia: American Coll of Physicians; 2001. Google Scholar14. Mossad SB, Macknin ML, Medendorp SV, Mason P. Zinc gluconate lozenges for treating the common cold. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. 1996; 125:81-8. [PMID: 8678384] Google Scholar15. Davidoff F. Where's the bias? [Editorial]. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:986-8. [PMID: 9182478] LinkGoogle Scholar16. . New forms for references [Editorial]. Ann Intern Med. 1979;90:985-6. [PMID: 375796] LinkGoogle Scholar17. Huth E. New forms for references. Br Med J. 1979;1:1697-8. [PMID: 380760] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar18. Huth EJ. Citations and references: the why and how of recommendations in Scientific Style and Format, the 6th edition of the CBE Style Manual. CBE Views. 1995;18:11-3. Google Scholar19. Huth EJ. Medical Style and Format. Philadelphia: ISI Pr; 1987:17-9. Google Scholar20. . Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Steering Committee. Ann Intern Med. 1979;90:95-9. [PMID: 420469] LinkGoogle Scholar21. . Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Steering Committee of Medical Editors. Br Med J. 1979;1:532-5. [PMID: 444872] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar22. Huth EJ. Manuscript requirements: the advance from Vancouver. Ann Intern Med. 1981;94:130. LinkGoogle Scholar23. Burman K. “Hanging from the masthead”: reflections on authorship. Ann Intern Med. 1982;97:602-5. [PMID: 7125418] LinkGoogle Scholar24. . Authorship from the reader's side [Editorial]. Ann Intern Med. 1982;97:613-4. [PMID: 7125421] LinkGoogle Scholar25. Hewitt RM. The Physician-Writer's Book: Tricks of the Trade of Medical Writing. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1957:312. Google Scholar26. Darsee JR, Nutter DO. Reversible severe congestive cardiomyopathy in three cases of hypophosphatemia. Ann Intern Med. 1978;89:867-70. [PMID: 363007] LinkGoogle Scholar27. Darsee JR, Miklozek CL, Heymsfield SB, Hopkins LC, Wenger NK. Mitral valve prolapse and ophthalmoplegia: a progressive, cardioneurologic syndrome. Ann Intern Med. 1980;92:735-41. [PMID: 6992676] LinkGoogle Scholar28. . Questions on the validity of papers on mitral valve prolapse and on cardiomyopathy [Letter]. Ann Intern Med. 1983;99:275-6. [PMID: 6349461] LinkGoogle Scholar29. Fotion N, Conrad CC. Authorship and other credits. Ann Intern Med. 1984;100:592-4. [PMID: 6703549] LinkGoogle Scholar30. Relman AS. Lessons from the Darsee affair [Editorial]. N Engl J Med. 1983;308:1415-7. [PMID: 6843634] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar31. . Guidelines on authorship. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Br Med J. 1985;291:722. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar32. . Editorial consensus on authorship and other matters [Editorial]. Lancet. 1985;2:595. [PMID: 2863604] MedlineGoogle Scholar33. Huth EJ. Standards on authors' responsibilities. Ann Intern Med. 1985;103:797. LinkGoogle Scholar34. Huth EJ. Guidelines on authorship of medical papers. Ann Intern Med. 1986;104:269-74. [PMID: 3511815] LinkGoogle Scholar35. . Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:36-47. [PMID: 8992922] LinkGoogle Scholar36. Rennie D, Yank V, Emanuel L. When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable. JAMA. 1997;278:579-85. [PMID: 9268280] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar37. . Task Force on Authorship, Council of Science Editors. Who's the author? Problems with biomedical authorship, and some possible solutions. Science Editor. 2000;23:111-9. Google Scholar38. Davidoff F. News from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors [Editorial]. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:229-31. [PMID: 10906840] LinkGoogle Scholar39. Huth EJ. The information explosion. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1989;65:647-61. [PMID: 2590751] MedlineGoogle Scholar40. Sox HC, ed. Common Diagnostic Tests: Use and Interpretation. Philadelphia: American Coll of Physicians; 1987. Google Scholar41. . Physicians for the twenty-first century. Report of the Project Panel on the General Professional Education of the Physician and College Preparation for Medicine. J Med Educ. 1984;59:1-208. [PMID: 6492116] MedlineGoogle Scholar42. Cassell E. The Place of the Humanities in Medicine. Hastings-on-Hudson, NY: The Hastings Center, Institute of Society, Ethics, and the Life Sciences; 1984. Google Scholar43. Warren KS. The humanities in medical education. Ann Intern Med. 1984;101:697-701. [PMID: 6486601] LinkGoogle Scholar44. . At your pleasure [Editorial]. Ann Intern Med. 1979;91:312. LinkGoogle Scholar45. Swan HJ. Kath. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117:1049-50. [PMID: 1443973] LinkGoogle Scholar46. LaCombe MA, ed. On Being a Doctor 2. Voices of Physicians and Patients. Philadelphia: American Coll of Physicians; 2000. Google Scholar47. Huth EJ. Structured abstracts for papers reporting clinical trials [Editorial]. Ann Intern Med. 1987;106:626-7. [PMID: 3826962] LinkGoogle Scholar48. Ertl N. A new way of documenting scientific data from medical publications. Karger Gazette. 1969;27 Nov:1-3. Google Scholar49. . A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles. Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature. Ann Intern Med. 1987;106:598-604. [PMID: 3826959] LinkGoogle Scholar50. Mulrow CD. The medical review article: state of the science. Ann Intern Med. 1987;106:485-8. [PMID: 3813259] LinkGoogle Scholar51. Chalmers I. Improving the quality and dissemination of reviews of clinical trials.. In: Lock S, eds. The Future of Medical Journals: in Commemoration of 150 Years of the British Medical Journal . London: BMJ; 1991. Google Scholar52. Kass EH. Reviewing reviews.. In: Warren KS, eds. Coping with the Biomedical Literature. New York: Praeger; 1981:79-91. Google Scholar53. Mulrow CD, Thacker SB, Pugh JA. A proposal for more informative abstracts of review articles. Ann Intern Med. 1988;108:613-5. [PMID: 3348568] LinkGoogle Scholar54. . Call for comments on a proposal to improve reporting of clinical trials in the biomedical literature. Working Group on Recommendations for Reporting of Clinical Trials in the Biomedical Literature. Ann Intern Med. 1994;121:894-5. [PMID: 7978706] LinkGoogle Scholar55. . Checklist of information for inclusion in reports of clinical trials. The Asilomar Working Group on Recommendations for Reporting of Clinical Trials in the Biomedical Literature. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:741-3. [PMID: 8633835] LinkGoogle Scholar56. Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, Horton R, Moher D, Olkin I, et al . Improving the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA. 1996;276:637-9. [PMID: 8773637] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar57. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:657-62. [PMID: 11304106] LinkGoogle Scholar58. Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, et al . The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:663-94. [PMID: 11304107] LinkGoogle Scholar59. Guyatt GH. Evidence-based medicine [Editorial]. ACP Journal Club. 1991;1:A-16. Google Scholar60. Davidoff F. www.annals.org [Editorial]. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:92. [PMID: 10627259] LinkGoogle Scholar61. Case K. The Scientific Editor in the Electronic Age. Proceedings of the Fifth ELSE/EDITERRA General Assembly and Joint Conference, Pau, France. Paris: European Space Agency; 1982:47-9. Google Scholar62. Covell DG, Uman GC, Manning PR. Information needs in office practice: are they being met? Ann Intern Med. 1985;103:596-9. [PMID: 4037559] LinkGoogle Scholar63. van Steenburgh J. Need a quick consult? Try this new College product. ACP–ASIM Observer. 2002;March:1. Google Scholar64. Badgett RG, Mulrow CD. Welcome, PIER, a new Physicians' Information and Education Resource [Editorial]. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:553-4. [PMID: 11926793] LinkGoogle Scholar65. Wilkes MS, Doblin BH, Shapiro MF. Pharmaceutical advertisements in leading medical journals: experts' assessments. Ann Intern Med. 1992;116:912-9. [PMID: 1580449] LinkGoogle Scholar66. Braitman LE. Confidence intervals extract clinically useful information from data [Editorial]. Ann Intern Med. 1988;108:296-8. [PMID: 3341659] LinkGoogle Scholar67. Davidoff F. Standing statistics right side up [Editorial]. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:1019-21. [PMID: 10383353] LinkGoogle Scholar68. Goodman SN, Berlin J, Fletcher SW, Fletcher RH. Manuscript quality before and after peer review and editing at Annals of Internal Medicine . Ann Intern Med. 1994;121:11-21. [PMID: 8198342] LinkGoogle Scholar69. Roberts JC, Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW. Effects of peer review and editing on the readability of articles published in Annals of Internal Medicine . JAMA. 1994;272:119-21. [PMID: 8015120] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar70. Davidoff F. Masking, blinding, and peer review: the blind leading the blinded [Editorial]. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128:66-8. [PMID: 9424984] LinkGoogle Scholar Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAuthors: Edward J. Huth, MD; Kathleen Case, MSAcknowledgments: The authors thank Drs. Robert and Suzanne Fletcher, Frank Davidoff, Hal Sox, Stephen Goodman, Gordon Guyatt, Brian Haynes, and David Sackett for their help with information and perspectives for this history; Meg Phillips, Archivist, ACP–ASIM, for copies of Annals reports; and Margaret Ring Gillock, Assistant Editor, Annals of Internal Medicine, for information on important Annals articles and on editors.Corresponding Author: Customer Service, American College of Physicians–American Society of Internal Medicine, 190 N. Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106.Current Author Addresses: Dr. Huth: 1124 Morris Avenue, Bryn Mawr, PA 19010.Ms. Case: American Association of Cancer Research, Division of Publishing and Communications, 150 S. Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106-3483. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsSee AlsoReflections on Medical Journals: Has Progress Made Them Better? Jerome P. Kassirer Metrics Cited byPredictors Linking Obesity and the Gut Microbiome (the PROMISE Study): Protocol and Recruitment Strategy for a Cross-Sectional Study on Pathways That Affect the Gut Microbiome and Its Impact on ObesityAnnals for the Ages: Annals of Internal Medicine Turns 90George D. Lundberg, MDAnnals: A Gathering Place for Internal MedicineChristine Laine, MD, MPH, EditorCommon weaknesses in traditional abstracts in the social sciencesAn ergonomic format for short reporting in scientific journals using nested tables and the Deming's cycleBenefit assessment of therapeutic products: the Centers for Education and Research on TherapeuticsAssessing the Performance of a Medical JournalAnnals Faces the Future: Quicker Service, Broader Access, Tailored FormatsThe EditorsConflicts between Commercial and Scientific Interests in Pharmaceutical Advertising for Medical JournalsProposal to Add an Optional Recommendations Section to Clinical Chemistry AbstractsThe Journal in 2002 2 July 2002Volume 137, Issue 1Page: 34-45KeywordsClinical trial reportingDatabasesEvidence based medicineLibrariesMedical educationPeer reviewPreventive medicineResearch reporting guidelinesStatistical dataSub-specialty care ePublished: 2 July 2002 Issue Published: 2 July 2002 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2002 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF downloadLoading ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.