MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Three-Dimensional Assessment of Tibial Malunion After Intramedullary Nailing: A Preliminary Study

2002· article· en· W1966101470 on OpenAlexaffabout
Michael Boucher, James Leone, M.R. Pierrynowski, Mohit Bhandari

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone fractures and treatments
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMalunionMedicineIntramedullary rodValgusDeformityAnkleOrthodonticsSurgeryValgus deformityRadiographyNonunion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was twofold: (a) to introduce a new three-dimensional digital assessment technique for the estimation of angular and rotational malunion and (b) to determine if an association exists between tibial malunion and functionally defined post-traumatic degeneration at the knee and ankle joint. DESIGN: Nonrandomized, cohort study, with 5.46 years (range 2 to 10 years) of follow-up. Subjects underwent a novel three-dimensional technique to determine the functional mechanical axis of both the knee and tibiotalar joints. Both the affected and unaffected limbs were tested. Differences between both limbs provided assessment of malunion in three planes with 1.8 +/- 0.1 percent (mean +/- SD) reliability. Patients completed the Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index, the Lower Extremity Functional Scale, and the Assessment System of Lower Extremity Function. Standard postoperative radiographs were also examined for evidence of malunion. SETTING: University-based Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: Seventy-one subjects with an isolated tibial fracture repaired with intramedullary nails were identified; thirteen met eligibility criteria for study inclusion. RESULTS: A total of 77 percent of the patients (mean follow-up 5.5 years, range 2 to 10 years) were malaligned in one or more of the three planes examined (malunion conventionally defined as >or=10 rotation, >or=5 varus-valgus, and >or=10 procurvatum-recurvatum). Mean varus-valgus deformity was 11.8 +/- 6.3 degrees, mean procurvatum-recurvatum deformity was 3.2 +/- 2.5 degrees, and medial-lateral rotational deformity was 9.6 +/- 4.7 degrees. There was no significant correlation (p > 0.05) between the overall alignment of the involved leg (intertibial difference) in any of the three directional planes and the subject's response to any of the three functional outcome scales used. Three-dimensional analysis differed significantly from radiographic interpretation when malunion occurred in the coronal plane (p = 0.0003). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that failure to meet conventionally accepted standards for tibial alignment might be common. Fortunately, these values were not associated with adverse functional outcomes. A three-dimensional system, which determines the functional mechanical axis of the knee and tibiotalar joints, may be a valuable and reliable method by which to determine malunion after fracture fixation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Orthopaedic TraumaSame topicBone fractures and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207