MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966115056 · doi:10.1117/12.2044550

Implementation of a self-sensing piezoelectric actuator for vibro-acoustic active control

2014· article· en· W1966115056 on OpenAlexaff
Anik Pelletier, Philippe Micheau, Alain Berry

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAeroelasticity and Vibration Control
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcousticsActuatorCapacitive sensingResistorPiezoelectric sensorElectrical impedanceTransducerVoltagePiezoelectricityCurrent (fluid)VibrationEngineeringElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significant reduction of airplane interior noise may be obtained by active structural acoustic control (ASAC) of fuselage panels. This requires to accurately measure the vibrations of the aircraft panels while injecting anti-vibrations. Co-located piezoelectric sensors and actuators, spatially distributed on the structure, are an interesting avenue since they can lead to the implementation of distributed virtual impedances. When the same piezoelectric device is used to simultaneously measure and actuate, it is called a self-sensing piezoelectric actuator (SSPA). When a SSPA is submitted to a voltage, the measured current is the sum of the electric current due to the capacitive effect of the transducer plus the mechanical current induced by the strain of the structure. The latter is an order of magnitude smaller than the total current measured. Provided the measured current is digitized with sufficient accuracy, adequate numerical processing can subtract the capacitive current from the total measured current. A similar processing can also be used to subtract from the sensor information, near-field vibrations induced by the collocated actuator. Hence, information related to the global, vibrational flexural modes of the plate is extracted without complicated electronics. The numerical method of current separation has been programmed and validated with MATLAB/SimulinkR® and implemented on Speedgoat hardware. A shunt resistor is used to measure the current simultaneously with the voltage measurement. Strain-induced current has been successfully extracted from SSPA signal with this method. Numerical simulations show good agreement with experimental data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicAeroelasticity and Vibration ControlFrench-language works237,207