MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966123261 · doi:10.3138/chr.81.3.347

Social Investment in Medical Forms: The 1866 Cholera Scare and Beyond

2000· article· en· W1966123261 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Historical Review · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCholeraInvestment (military)Political scienceMedicineVirologyLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With rare exceptions, the 1866 cholera scare has been regarded as an anti-climax to the epidemics of the previous decades. Cholera did not assume epidemic form in Canada in 1866, and the scare has been seen as a non-event. In contrast to earlier epidemics, however, on this occasion the government acted rapidly in anticipation of disease. A conference of medical experts was convened, existing wisdom on cholera was assembled, and a public education campaign was conducted to reassure and prepare citizens. The Public Health Act was proclaimed and a group of doctors, themselves still struggling for professional recognition, was accorded extensive powers over the police of towns and the conduct of individual citizens. Quarantine regulations were reorganized and made much more extensive. Locally, it is suggested, the threat of cholera stimulated interest and activity in the name of the public health, particularly through sanitary initiatives. The scare contributed to the formation of local associations, connected in a network that would later issue in an attempt at national sanitary investigation. The deputy minister of agriculture, Joseph-Charles Tache, recently engaged to reform the statistical apparatus of government, in alliance with other activists, attempted to invest the domain of public health in forms that would make it into an object of intervention. Abstract: A quelques exceptions pres, la peur du cholera de 1866 a ete interprete comme un ‘anti-climax’ aux epidemies des annees 1830, 1840 et 1850. Comme la maladie n’avait pas adoptee une forme epidemique, on a ete porte a croire que que ľevenement comportait peu ďinteret historique. Par contre, en 1866, le gouvernement n’attend pas la declaration de la maladie avant ďagir, ce qui constitue une premiere. On convoque une conference de medecins-experts a Ottawa afin de connaitre la vraie nature de la maladie et afin de definir les mesures necessaires pour la combattre. La loi de la Sante Publique est proclamee et un petit groupe de medecins se voit octroyer des pouvoirs extensifs sur la conduite tant dė la police des villes que du comportement des individus. On procede a la reorganisation et a ľextension des mesures de la quarantaine. Nous proposons que la peur de la peste a provoque un eveil ďactivite en matiere de sante publique dans les localites et a encourage des acteurs a prendre des initiatives sanitaires. Des associations locales se sont formees et se sont joigntes dans un reseau axe sur le Conseil Central de Sante. Sous la direction du ministre-adjoint de ľAgriculture, J.-C. Tache, qui a lui-meme le mandat de renforcer ľappareil statistique, nous remarquons des tentatives ďinvestir le domaine de la sante publique sous formes aptes a le transformer en lieu ďintervention administrative.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.468
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it