MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966132637 · doi:10.1080/10942910903207728

Effect of Heat-Induced Changes of Connective Tissue and Collagen on Meat Texture Properties of Beef<i>Semitendinosus</i>Muscle

2010· article· en· W1966132637 on OpenAlexaff
Haijun Chang, Qiang Wang, Xinglian Xu, Chunbao Li, Ming Huang, Guanghong Zhou, Yan Dai

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Food Properties · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMeat and Animal Product Quality
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education and Child Care
FundersMinistry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China
KeywordsConnective tissueTexture (cosmology)ChemistrySemitendinosus muscleFood scienceCooked meatMaterials scienceAnatomyBiologyMedicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effects of heat-induced changes of intramuscular connective tissue (IMCT) and collagen on meat texture properties of beef Semitendinosus (ST) muscle were investigated in this study. ST muscle was heated to core temperature from 40 to 90°C with an increment of 5°C in a water bath and microwave oven, respectively. Characteristics changes of IMCT collagen and meat texture were estimated. The results indicated that: cooking loss, total collagen and soluble collagen content increased with the increase in heating temperature and time. Collagen solubility of thermally treated meat was relatively high at 65°C irrespective of heat treatment mode. The granulation changes of connective tissue collagen occurred at 60°C and increased during heating to higher core temperatures. The instrumental texture profile analysis (TPA) data of heated meat showed also significant differences between two heating modes and studied temperatures. Results indicated that heating internal core temperature of 60°C and 65°C were critical for affecting meat texture properties owing to the thermal effects of collagen in water bath and microwave heating, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Food PropertiesSame topicMeat and Animal Product QualityFrench-language works237,207