MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966150230 · doi:10.5539/eer.v4n2p3

Desalination Behavior of Calcined Hydrotalcite From Seawater for Preparation of Agricultural Cultivation Solution Using Natural Zeolite

2014· article· en· W1966150230 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Takaaki Wajima

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy and Environment Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLayered Double Hydroxides Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeawaterZeoliteHydrotalciteCalcinationChemistryDesalinationNuclear chemistryInorganic chemistryChemical engineeringCatalysisOrganic chemistryMembraneGeologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The desalination behavior of calcined hydrotalcite (CHT) from seawater used to treat seawater that was subsequently subjected to zeolite treatment prior to application of irrigation water was investigated. The results revealed that CHT removed Cl–, SO42–, Mg2+ and Ca2+ from seawater, but that Na+ and K+ were almost unchanged, and that CHT treatment made the pH of the solution alkaline. As the solution temperature increased, the solution pH increased, the rate of Mg2+, Ca2+, Cl– and SO42– removal improved, and greater Cl– removal was observed. Following CHT treatment, the obtained solution (CHT-solution) had a high Na+ content and high pH (approximately 12), while treatment of CHT-solution with natural zeolite neutralized the pH of the CHT-solution and reduced the Na+ content. Although germination of radish sprouts did not observed using seawater and CHT-solution, the growth of radish sprouts could be observed using the final solution after natural zeolite treatment of CHT-solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy and Environment ResearchSame topicLayered Double Hydroxides Synthesis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207