MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966153123 · doi:10.1021/es0340275

A Novel Technique for Rapid Extraction of Volatile Organohalogen Compounds from Low Permeability Media

2003· article· en· W1966153123 on OpenAlexafffund
Iuliana Dincutoiu, Tadeusz Górecki, Beth L. Parker

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science & Technology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical chemistry methods development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsExtraction (chemistry)ChromatographyTrichloroethyleneSonicationChemistryGas chromatographySample preparationShakerElectron capture detectorEnvironmental chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new method for rapid extraction of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) from low permeability, unconsolidated geologic media such as clayey soil has been developed and tested using trichloroethylene (TCE) as the model compound. The technique is based on a combination of sonication and mechanical agitation of the samples. The sample vials, mounted in a special holder attached to an orbital shaker, were immersed in an ultrasonic bath during extraction. The extracts were analyzed by gas chromatography with electron capture detection (GC-ECD). The method was validated using clay samples from a TCE-contaminated industrial site by comparing TCE recoveries to those obtained by the standard methanol extraction. In all cases, the recoveries obtained with the new method were the same or better than the recoveries obtained with the reference method. The extraction time was shortened from 5 days with the standard method to less than 2 h with the new method. The new technique makes it possible to analyze a large number of samples in a short time, without the need for sample preservation and prolonged storage. It has good potential for on-site analysis to facilitate decisions while field investigations are in progress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Science & TechnologySame topicAnalytical chemistry methods developmentFrench-language works237,207