Bibliographic record
Abstract
Both Alport syndrome and thin basement membrane nephropathy (TBMN) can be considered as genetic diseases of the GBM involving the alpha3/alpha4/alpha5 network of type IV collagen. Mutations in any of the COL4A3, COL4A4 or COL4A5 genes can lead to total or partial loss of this network. Males with mutations in the X-linked COL4A5 gene develop Alport syndrome with progressive renal disease and sometimes extra-renal disease. Females who are heterozygous for a COL4A5 mutation are considered to be carriers for X-linked Alport syndrome. Although their clinical course and GBM ultrastructural changes can sometimes mimic TBMN, more often it tends to be more progressive than usually seen in TBMN. Males or females who are heterozygous for COL4A3 or COL4A4 mutations usually manifest as TBMN, with nonprogressive hematuria, while those who are homozygous or combined heterozygotes develop autosomal-recessive Alport syndrome. Thus, individuals with TBMN can be considered to be carriers for autosomal-recessive Alport syndrome, but there remain some exceptions in which patients heterozygous for COL4A3 or COL4A4 mutations develop autosomal-dominant Alport syndrome. Distinguishing between all these groups of patients requires a combination of family history and a renal biopsy for electron microscopic examination of the GBM and immunohistochemical staining of the GBM for the alpha3, alpha4 and alpha5 chains of type IV collagen. Mutational analysis of the COL4A3, COL4A4, and COL4A5 genes, whenever it becomes available, will be a valuable adjunct to the diagnostic workup in these patients. Novel therapeutic approaches may one day provide a treatment or cure for these patients, avoiding the need for transplantation and dialysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".