MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966165751 · doi:10.1021/nl010061a

Stability Enhancement of Partially-Oxidized Porous Silicon Nanostructures Modified with Ethyl Undecylenate

2001· article· en· W1966165751 on OpenAlexaff
Rabah Boukherroub, Danial D. M. Wayner, G. I. Sproule, D. J. Lockwood, Leigh Canham

Bibliographic record

VenueNano Letters · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSilicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence
Canadian institutionsSteacie Institute for Molecular SciencesInstitute for Microstructural Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceMonolayerSiliconChemical engineeringThermal stabilityPorous siliconCovalent bondChemical stabilityAnhydrousAnodizingPorosityNanostructureX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyInorganic chemistryChemistryOrganic chemistryNanotechnologyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The thermal reaction of ethyl undecylenate with a hydrogen-terminated porous silicon surface takes place at 85 °C to yield an organic monolayer covalently attached to the surface through Si−C bonds. The presence of traces of water in ethyl undecylenate induces a partial oxidation of the surface and leads to a surface that is composed of alkylated and oxidized regions. A PSi surface with a comparable chemical composition was prepared by the direct reaction of an electrochemically anodized PSi surface (in 1 M H 2 SO 4 ) with anhydrous ethyl undecylenate. The physical and chemical properties of the functionalized surfaces have been characterized using photoluminescence, transmission infrared, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopies. The derivatized surfaces proved to be very stable in boiling CCl 4 and water, and against corrosion when exposed to 100% humidity in air.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations74
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNano LettersSame topicSilicon Nanostructures and PhotoluminescenceFrench-language works237,207