Realization of Workers' Health Promotion Services under the Umbrella of the National Health Promotion System of Korea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Realization of Workers' Health Promotion Services under the Umbrella of the National Health Promotion System of Korea: Yong‐Tae Yum, Institute for Environmental Health, Korea University—Since the Ottawa Charter (1986), Health Promotion (H.P.) activities have spread worldwide. The Republic of Korea is not exceptional. In 1995, the H.P. Law was launched and service activities were started. However, H.P. at worksites in terms of occupational health services has been operating since 1960. The backbone of the national H.P. System in Korea was not very different from that of Japan and other countries. It included out‐door exercise, periodic health check‐ups, indoor exercise, gymnastic exercise, fitness programs, nutritional education, drinking cessation, smoking cessation, and other health counseling. For worksite H.P., special concern was given to periodic check‐ups which comprised of both common and occupational diseases. In addition, periodic inspections of work environments were another major task of H.P. for workers. The last area of H.P. can be categorized as counseling and education collectively. Counseling and education activity for workers of medium and small scale enterprises where the number of workers is less than 300 is carried out by the Health Care Supporting Agency (HCSA) which is composed of 12 occupational health centers belonging to the Korean Industrial Health Association and other private agents. Strategies of health care supporting services of HCSA should be adopted in the future national plan of workers' health promotion in Korea. HP copied from THP of Japan is not suitable for Korea at all.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".