MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966175738 · doi:10.1029/2006gl027692

Modelling deep seasonal temperature changes in the Labrador Sea

2006· article· en· W1966175738 on OpenAlexaffabout
Youyu Lu, Daniel G. Wright, R. Allyn Clarke

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsBedford Institute of Oceanography
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdvectionIsopycnalMooringGeologyOceanographyHydrographyClimatologyContinental shelfSea surface temperatureMixed layer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An eddy‐admitting model of the North Atlantic is applied to study the seasonal variations of temperature at 1000 m in the Labrador Sea. The model successfully reproduces the seasonal cycle of the near‐bottom temperature observed from a long‐term mooring deployed on the 1000 m isobath on the upper continental slope off Labrador. It also provides an estimate of the spatial distribution of the seasonal temperature variation in the whole Labrador Sea that can be interpreted in terms of the roles played by surface cooling, deep convection, lateral mixing and advection. The model results suggest that mixing along the steeply sloped isopycnal surfaces plays an important role in communicating the cold water formed by surface cooling to deep layers over the Labrador Slope in later winter. Upstream conditions are also communicated to the mooring site along the Slope through advection by the prevailing cyclonic circulation. In particular, the advection of warm water off Greenland contributes to the gradual warming from spring to winter at the mooring site.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.218

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFrench-language works237,207