MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966216022 · doi:10.1002/ddr.20033

Potential use of neurosteroids and neuroactive steroids as modulators of symptoms of depression, anxiety, and psychotic disorders

2005· article· en· W1966216022 on OpenAlexaff
B. Dubrovsky

Bibliographic record

VenueDrug Development Research · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicStress Responses and Cortisol
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroactive steroidEndocrinologyReceptorInternal medicineAMPA receptorAllopregnanolonePregnanoloneGlutamate receptorChemistryKainate receptorGABAA receptorNMDA receptorNeurosciencePharmacologyPsychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The term “neurosteroid” (NS) was introduced by Baulieu in 1981 to name a steroid hormone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), that was found at high levels in the brain long after gonadectomy and adrenalectomy, and shown later to be synthesized by the brain. The term “neuroactive steroid” (NAS) refers to steroids that, independent of their origin, are capable of modifying neural activities. NASs bind and modulate different types of membrane receptors. The γ‐amino butyric acid (GABA) and Sigma receptor complexes have been the most extensively studied, while glycine chloride channels, nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, and voltage‐activated calcium channels, although less explored, are also modulated by NASs. Within the glutamate receptor family, N ‐methyl‐D‐aspartate (NMDA) receptors, α‐amino‐3‐hydroxy‐5‐methyl‐4‐isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors and kainate receptors have been shown to be targets for NA and NAS modulation. Inside the neuron, Oxidized ring A reduced pregnanes, tetrahydroprogesterone (THP), and tetrahydrodeoxycorticosterone (THDOC) bind to the progesterone intracellular receptor (PR) and in this way can also regulate gene expression. Animal experimentation showed that cardinal symptoms of depression, anxiety, sleep disturbances, and memory dysfunctions are partly regulated by NAS. In turn, NAS and NS levels are modulated by psychotropic medications. NS levels, as well as NAS plasma concentrations, change in patients with depression syndromes, the levels return to normal baseline with recovery, but normalization is not necessary for successful therapy. Rather than with nosological syndromes and psychiatric disorders, NAS and NS steroid levels seem to correlate with specific symptoms. Hence, it will be profitable to search for and establish symptom‐steroid relationships, as well as pharmacological and endogenous factors that can modulate NS biosynthesis and NAS formation, to be able to use these steroids in therapy. Drug Dev Res 65:318–334, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDrug Development ResearchSame topicStress Responses and CortisolFrench-language works237,207