MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966286320 · doi:10.1136/jnis.2009.000869y

025 Crossed cerebellar diaschisis: assessment with dynamic contrast imaging on whole brain perfusion on 320 slice CT scanner

2009· article· en· W1966286320 on OpenAlexaff
Jai Shankar, Cheemun Lum

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of NeuroInterventional Surgery · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiaschisisMedicineCerebellumAfferentPositron emission tomographyPerfusion scanningPerfusionNeuroscienceNuclear medicineRadiologyAnatomyInternal medicinePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Crossed cerebellar diaschisis refers to metabolic depression in the cerebellum contralateral to supratentorial lesions. It was first described in the positron emission tomography (PET) literature. Crossed cerebellar diaschisis is interpreted as functional deactivation, presumably caused by a loss of excitatory or inhibitory afferent inputs, on the corticopontocerebellar or other pathways. This phenomenon has been repeatedly described in studies examining oxygen consumption, cerebellar blood flow and …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.565
Threshold uncertainty score0.678

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeuroInterventional SurgerySame topicFetal and Pediatric Neurological DisordersFrench-language works237,207