MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966300193 · doi:10.4043/25575-ms

Field Data for Sea Ice and Iceberg Drift Offshore Newfoundland and Labrador

2015· article· en· W1966300193 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Rocky Taylor, Ian Turnbull, Aaron Slaney

Bibliographic record

VenueOTC Arctic Technology Conference · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersHibernia Management and Development Company
KeywordsBeaconIcebergSea iceSubmarine pipelineDrift iceOceanographyGeologyLead (geology)Seabed gouging by iceAntarctic sea iceOffshore wind powerMeteorologyClimatologyArctic ice packGeographyComputer scienceEngineeringTelecommunicationsWind powerGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper is focused on new field data collected for drift behaviour of first-year sea ice, a multi-year ice floe and two icebergs offshore Newfoundland and Labrador. Offshore operations in ice environments require detailed knowledge of ice conditions. Moreover, reliable forecasts of ice drift behaviour for first-year sea ice and extreme ice features such as thick multi-year (MY) ice and icebergs are essential in supporting ice management activities and in supporting effective operational decision-making. Central to the development of improved drift forecasting models is the collection of new field data that can be used to improve understanding of the physical environment and to validate and improve predictive tools. Three ice drift beacons have recently been deployed offshore Newfoundland and Labrador. In the present paper, a description of the beacons used, deployment activities, as well as results from these beacons are reported, along with initial analysis of these data. These new data provide interesting and sometimes unexpected drift behaviour. Results from these beacons are analyzed in light of ocean current and wind data and conclusions regarding the correlations between these environmental conditions and observed drift behaviour are discussed for each case.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.483
Threshold uncertainty score0.849

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOTC Arctic Technology ConferenceSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207