Angiogenesis for the Treatment of Inoperable Coronary Disease: The Future
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Improved treatment options and better management of cardiovascular risk factors have resulted in improved outcomes for patients suffering from severe coronary artery disease. However, coronary artery disease may be of such a diffuse and severe manner that repeated attempts at catheter-based interventions and coronary artery bypass grafting may be unsuccessful at restoring normal myocardial blood flow. It is the goal of therapeutic angiogenesis to restore perfusion to chronically ischemic myocardium using protein growth factors, gene therapy, or, more recently, cell-based therapy, without intervening on the epicardial coronary arteries. However, angiogenesis has not yet provided significant clinical benefit and is still reserved as an experimental treatment for patients who have failed conventional therapies. Once potential endogenous inhibitors of vascular development can be modified, angiogenesis may become more useful for therapeutic purposes. It is hoped that angiogenesis for therapeutic purposes will one day effectively re-create the potent natural processes of vascularization that every human being undergoes during growth and development and become a major modality for the treatment of coronary artery disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".