MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966327828 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450810332

Parametric Study of a Novel Basket Impeller Column

2003· article· en· W1966327828 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProcess Optimization and Integration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImpellerPressure dropSieve (category theory)Mass transferParametric statisticsDistillationDraft tubeTrayMechanicsFractionating columnFlow (mathematics)Volumetric flow rateEnvironmental scienceProcess engineeringPetroleum engineeringMechanical engineeringMaterials scienceEngineeringMathematicsChromatographyChemistryPhysicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Basket Impeller Column combines the mass transfer advantages of a spinning basket reactor with the practicality of a dual flow tray column to achieve controllable liquid holdup, as well as a potential solution to many of the problems plaguing current catalytic distillation internals. Sieve plate design, impeller size and speed, along with water and air, flow rates were explored in order to establish a feasible design. An optimal set of specifications was determined via statistical evaluation. Additional experiments were then conducted to obtain correlations for liquid holdup, gas holdup, froth height, pressure drop and power in terms of the significant hydraulic variables.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score0.276

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it