MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966341962 · doi:10.1108/02756660510575014

Inside the new organization: a blueprint for surviving restructuring, downsizing, acquisitions and outsourcing

2005· article· en· W1966341962 on OpenAlexaff
Donald J. Minnick, R. Duane Ireland

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Business Strategy · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicOrganizational Downsizing and Restructuring
Canadian institutionsEmployment and Social Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThrivingBlueprintRestructuringOutsourcingWork (physics)Interpersonal communicationPublic relationsKnowledge managementPsychologyBusinessMarketingEngineeringComputer sciencePolitical scienceSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose To describe a model of interpersonal competencies for surviving and thriving in today's new, leaner organization. Our work is based on interviews and surveys of individuals who have been chosen to staff resized organizations and the managers who have made those selections. Design/methodology/approach Over the last 15 years, the authors found that clients in the organizations with which they consulted were often struggling with understanding what interpersonal competencies the new leaner, horizontally-structured organizations required of their employees. Several formats were used to gather answers to those questions. First, information first surfaced informally. Then, intrigued by what individuals in these informal sessions were relating, the authors sent open-ended written surveys to other clients as well as to participants in work-conferences and training sessions. In these written surveys two major questions were posed: “What are the characteristics, skills and competencies of the employees who have survived re-sizing in your organization?” and “How will the employee's role in the organization change due to new structures: leaner, more horizontally structured, more cross-functional and team based?” Content analyses of the responses allowed us to develop what appears to be a blueprint for individual success inside the new organization. Findings A model for survival and success inside the new organization was constructed based on the survey data collected. In addition, the recent literature in the areas of organizational and business re-design, and the writings of the most well-respected business writers was searched to validate the model and to provide a context through which it could be understood and successfully applied. Two complementary core values – personal initiative and the capacity for collaboration – were found to be essential for organizational survival. Similarly, four additional skillsets – mental agility, personal visibility, team facilitation and boundary spanning – were determined to lay the groundwork for success inside the new organization. Research limitations/implications Although broadly based from Fortune 500 companies to small entrepreneurial start-ups, the individuals completing the surveys were exclusively clients of the authors. The roughly 250 surveys that were content-analyzed comprised roughly 40 percent of the total survey base. Surveying a larger respondent population and analyzing the responses by organization size or type would help to refine the model. Practical implications The organizational survivor model provides a clear and dynamic blueprint for all people wanting to sharpen the skills necessary to survive in today's business world. Individuals wanting to make themselves indispensable to their employers as well as people desiring to put themselves on track for success in their next job. In addition, the findings will also prove invaluable to human resources and training departments in search of a teachable model for creating interpersonal excellence. Originality/value This paper fulfills a need for a sound, data-based, real-world grounded guide for individual success inside the new organization. Self-assessments, practical suggestions and recommendations assist readers in increasing their personal impact and value and making themselves indispensable in their organizations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.018
Scholarly communication0.0090.008
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Business StrategySame topicOrganizational Downsizing and RestructuringFrench-language works237,207