MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1966341962 · doi:10.1108/02756660510575014

Inside the new organization: a blueprint for surviving restructuring, downsizing, acquisitions and outsourcing

2005· article· en· W1966341962 sur OpenAlexaff
Donald J. Minnick, R. Duane Ireland

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Business Strategy · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueOrganizational Downsizing and Restructuring
Établissements canadiensEmployment and Social Development Canada
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésThrivingBlueprintRestructuringOutsourcingWork (physics)Interpersonal communicationPublic relationsKnowledge managementPsychologyBusinessMarketingEngineeringComputer sciencePolitical scienceSocial psychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Purpose To describe a model of interpersonal competencies for surviving and thriving in today's new, leaner organization. Our work is based on interviews and surveys of individuals who have been chosen to staff resized organizations and the managers who have made those selections. Design/methodology/approach Over the last 15 years, the authors found that clients in the organizations with which they consulted were often struggling with understanding what interpersonal competencies the new leaner, horizontally-structured organizations required of their employees. Several formats were used to gather answers to those questions. First, information first surfaced informally. Then, intrigued by what individuals in these informal sessions were relating, the authors sent open-ended written surveys to other clients as well as to participants in work-conferences and training sessions. In these written surveys two major questions were posed: “What are the characteristics, skills and competencies of the employees who have survived re-sizing in your organization?” and “How will the employee's role in the organization change due to new structures: leaner, more horizontally structured, more cross-functional and team based?” Content analyses of the responses allowed us to develop what appears to be a blueprint for individual success inside the new organization. Findings A model for survival and success inside the new organization was constructed based on the survey data collected. In addition, the recent literature in the areas of organizational and business re-design, and the writings of the most well-respected business writers was searched to validate the model and to provide a context through which it could be understood and successfully applied. Two complementary core values – personal initiative and the capacity for collaboration – were found to be essential for organizational survival. Similarly, four additional skillsets – mental agility, personal visibility, team facilitation and boundary spanning – were determined to lay the groundwork for success inside the new organization. Research limitations/implications Although broadly based from Fortune 500 companies to small entrepreneurial start-ups, the individuals completing the surveys were exclusively clients of the authors. The roughly 250 surveys that were content-analyzed comprised roughly 40 percent of the total survey base. Surveying a larger respondent population and analyzing the responses by organization size or type would help to refine the model. Practical implications The organizational survivor model provides a clear and dynamic blueprint for all people wanting to sharpen the skills necessary to survive in today's business world. Individuals wanting to make themselves indispensable to their employers as well as people desiring to put themselves on track for success in their next job. In addition, the findings will also prove invaluable to human resources and training departments in search of a teachable model for creating interpersonal excellence. Originality/value This paper fulfills a need for a sound, data-based, real-world grounded guide for individual success inside the new organization. Self-assessments, practical suggestions and recommendations assist readers in increasing their personal impact and value and making themselves indispensable in their organizations.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,009
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,035

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,018
Communication savante0,0090,008
Science ouverte0,0010,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,215
Écart entre enseignants0,201 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations16
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Business StrategyMême sujetOrganizational Downsizing and RestructuringTravaux en français237 207