MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966348773 · doi:10.1002/prot.10329

Minimal model for studying prion‐like folding pathways

2003· article· en· W1966348773 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueProteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPrion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFolding (DSP implementation)Energy landscapeProtein foldingBeta sheetBETA (programming language)Alpha helixDownhill foldingChemistryMonte Carlo methodHelix (gastropod)Hydrogen bondProtein secondary structureLattice proteinCrystallographyChemical physicsProtein structurePhysicsMoleculeMathematicsBiologyPhi value analysisComputer scienceBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Monte Carlo technique is used to simulate the energy landscape and the folding kinetics of a minimal prion-like protein model. We show that the competition between hydrogen-bonding and hydrophobic interactions yields two energetically favored secondary structures, an alpha-helix and a beta-hairpin. Folding simulations indicate that the probability of reaching the alpha-helix form from a denatured random conformation is much higher than the probability of reaching the beta-sheet form, even though the beta-sheet has a lower energy. The existence of a lower energy beta-sheet state gives the possibility for the normal alpha-helix structure to take a structural transformation into the beta-sheet structure under external influences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.551
Threshold uncertainty score0.705

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it