La signification des activités quotidiennes chez les personnes souffrant de troubles mentaux graves
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Severe mental disorders affect the daily activities and lifestyles of people suffering from these problems. A descriptive study was conducted in order to determine the meaning that people with severe mental disorders give to their daily activities. In this study, the meaning of the activities was defined based on Kielhofner's Human Occupation Model, using three indicators: sense of competence, importance and pleasure. These indicators were measured for each daily activity through a semi-structured interview of 45 people suffering from severe mental disorders, using the Occupational Questionnaire. In general, the activities included in the categories of hygiene and self-care, meals and sleep, scored the highest average for each indicator, i.e. sense of competence, importance and pleasure. Work, however, stands out in terms of the importance it is given as an activity, while social activities are valued through their association with pleasure. An analysis of the results underlines the importance that occupational therapists have an improved understanding of the meaning that people suffering from mental disorders give to their daily activities in order to support their efforts in developing a more positive perception of the way they occupy their time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".