Estudo de Impacto de Vizinhança: Um Aspecto da Função Social da Propriedade Urbana / Neighborhood Impact Study:Aspect of Urban Social Function of Property
Bibliographic record
Abstract
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12957/rdc.2011.9855 Trabalho recebido e avaliado pelos Conselhos Editorial e Executivo da Revista de Direito da Cidade Resumo: Este artigo aborda o Estudo de Impacto de Vizinhança, instituído pela Lei nº 10.257, de 10 de julho de 2001, conforme o novo formato conferido ao direito de propriedade pela Constituição Federal de 1988, que vincula o exercício do direito de construir ao atendimento da função sócio-ambiental da propriedade urbana, conforme estabelecido no Plano Diretor da Cidade. Palavras-chave: Direito Urbanístico. Direito de Construir. Direito de Propriedade. Estatuto da Cidade. Estudo de Impacto de Vizinhança. Abstract: This article discusses the Study of Neighborhood Impact, established by Law No. 10.257/2001 of July , as the new format given to property rights by the Constitution of 1988 that links the exercise of the right to build the service the socio-environmental function of urban property, as set out in the Master Plan of the City. Keywords: Urban Law. Right to Build. Property Law. City Statute. Neighborhood Impact Study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".