MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966382751 · doi:10.12957/rdc.2011.9855

Estudo de Impacto de Vizinhança: Um Aspecto da Função Social da Propriedade Urbana / Neighborhood Impact Study:Aspect of Urban Social Function of Property

2011· article· pt· W1966382751 on OpenAlex
Cláudia Alves de Oliveira

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Direito da Cidade · 2011
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicBrazilian Legal Issues
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial functionHumanitiesStatuteConstitutionPolitical scienceSociologyLawArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12957/rdc.2011.9855 Trabalho recebido e avaliado pelos Conselhos Editorial e Executivo da Revista de Direito da Cidade Resumo: Este artigo aborda o Estudo de Impacto de Vizinhança, instituído pela Lei nº 10.257, de 10 de julho de 2001, conforme o novo formato conferido ao direito de propriedade pela Constituição Federal de 1988, que vincula o exercício do direito de construir ao atendimento da função sócio-ambiental da propriedade urbana, conforme estabelecido no Plano Diretor da Cidade. Palavras-chave: Direito Urbanístico. Direito de Construir. Direito de Propriedade. Estatuto da Cidade. Estudo de Impacto de Vizinhança. Abstract: This article discusses the Study of Neighborhood Impact, established by Law No. 10.257/2001 of July , as the new format given to property rights by the Constitution of 1988 that links the exercise of the right to build the service the socio-environmental function of urban property, as set out in the Master Plan of the City. Keywords: Urban Law. Right to Build. Property Law. City Statute. Neighborhood Impact Study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.330
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it