MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966395677 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2014.05.078

IC‐P‐073: DISSIMILARITY BASED EXTRACTION OF COVARIANCE LINKED NETWORK (DECLINE) FEATURES FOR EARLY DETECTION OF AD

2014· article· en· W1966395677 on OpenAlexaff
Pradeep Reddy Ramana, Lei Wang, Mirza Faisal Beg

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBrain Tumor Detection and Classification
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEntorhinal cortexPrecuneusCovarianceCognitive declineDementiaNeurosciencePattern recognition (psychology)Cortex (anatomy)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceCognitionPsychologyDiseaseHippocampusMedicineMathematicsPathologyStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cortical thickness analysis is a powerful tool to assess the onset and progression of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's. Spatial gradients in cortical thinning are a hallmark of dementias, and are shown to follow stereotypical patterns specific to each dementia. There is tremendous variability of cortical thickness across the population, but the signature of the disease is much more clearly visible in cortical thickness gradients taken between different brain regions, for example anterior-posterior gradients in AD as AD is known to affect the posterior cortices such as the medial temporal lobes, the precuneus, parietal areas, entorhinal cortex preferentially and early in the course of the disease. Keeping this idea of preferential gradient is mind, We reformulate our previously developed novel imaging cortical biomarker based on graph-theoretic analysis of inter-regional covariance of cortical thickness, called ThickNet features [1] to develop novel covariance features based on dissimilarity in thickness. These features capture the spatial thickness gradients within each subject. We call them Dissimilarity based Extraction of Covariance LInked NEtwork (DECLINE) features. We show that they outperform ThickNet features for the early detection of Alzheimer's disease. DECLINE features are first of its kind and show promise in detecting the cognitive decline predictive of AD. Cortical thickness is extracted from the MRI scan using the method [2] for each patient and the features are registered to a common atlas surface to establish vertex-wise correspondence. Then the cortex of each patient is partitioned into large number (e.g. K=300 vertices per patch) of small areas by k-means clustering of vertices spatially on the atlas surface (Figure 1). A graph is then constructed by establishing a link between two such patches if dissimilarity in thickness is above a given threshold (e.g. 0.5mm). Dissimilarity is defined as abs. difference in mean-thickness from the two patches. From this binary undirected graph, we compute several graph-theoretic properties - called DECLINE features - to represent each patient (See Figure 2), namely nodal degree, betweenness centrality and clustering coefficient. DECLINE features are intrinsic to each patient and offer a novel insight into neurodegeneration caused by various diseases. Using the same dataset (ADNI) on which we demonstrated the diagnostic utility of ThickNet features, we show that DECLINE features outperform ThickNet features, and show potential for the early detection of Alzheimer's disease. Using our Repeated Holdout, Stratified Training set (RHsT) cross-validation method proposed in [1] (See Figure 3), We evaluate the performance of DECLINE features. They produced an area under ROC (AUC) of 0.93 in discriminating AD from healthy controls (CN), and an AUC of 0.87 in discriminating MCI converters (MCIc) from CN. We also present results for two other experiments: MCIc vs. MCI non-converters (MCInc) and CN vs. MCI (MCIc+MCInc). The results presented in Figure 4 show DECLINE features significantly outperform ThickNet features in all the experiments. We present novel DECLINE measures based on inter-regional covariance of cortical thickness from structural MRI. We demonstrate their diagnostic utility in four classification experiments on benchmark ADNI dataset, and esp. for early detection of Alzheimer's disease. DECLINE features show promise for predictive modeling in neuroimaging applications. Visualization of Cortical Parcellation Resulting from our Method, with approx. 300 vertices per patch. DECLINE Feature extraction. cross-validation to evaluate classification performance of the features. Comparison of Best Classification Results in each binary experiment for the two methods. References: 1. Raamana, PR, Wang, L, Beg, MF (2013). Thickness NETwork (ThickNet) Features for the Detection of Prodromal AD. Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, 8184 (Chapter 15), 114-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02267-3_15. 2. Gibson E, Wang L, Beg MF. Cortical thickness measurement using Eulerian PDEs and surface-based global topological information. Org Human Brain Mapping, 15th Annual Meeting. 2009.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score0.622

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationFrench-language works237,207