MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966401750 · doi:10.1109/82.885136

A low V/sub t/ CMOS implementation of an LPLV digital filter core for portable audio applications

2000· article· en· W1966401750 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II Analog and Digital Signal Processing · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Filter Design and Implementation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital biquad filterCMOSComputer scienceFilter (signal processing)Electronic engineeringComputationComputer hardwareDigital filterLow-power electronicsLow-pass filterPower consumptionPower (physics)EngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A low power 32nd-order digital filter for portable audio applications has been designed and implemented in a single threshold 1-V 0.5-/spl mu/m CMOS process. The design is full custom, using a combination of conventional CMOS and pass-transistor circuits, optimized for low energy consumption and small area. The filter features up to 16 biquad sections with programmable coefficients and performs fixed-point computations with 16-bit resolution. The measured average energy consumption of 330 pJ per biquad computation indicates that the implementation of complex digital signal processing in a single-threshold low-voltage process is a viable alternative to implementations in multiple threshold processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it