MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1966427392 · doi:10.7202/042918ar

L'exécution, la transmission, l'extinction, les modalités et le cautionnement : commentaires

2005· article· fr· W1966427392 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Louise Poudrier-LeBel

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers de droit · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La partie de l'Avant-projet commentée ici comporte une véritable réforme du droit. Les rédacteurs y élaborent une théorie des obligations et donnent un nouveau visage au cautionnement. Ils apportent des changements majeurs aux modes d'évaluation des dommages-intérêts et privilégient l'exécution en nature. Ils modernisent les modes de paiement ainsi que le mécanisme des offres réelles et de la consignation. Quant aux modalités des obligations, l'Avant-projet codifie les obligations conjointes et facultatives. Il propose aussi des modifications substantielles au régime juridique de la solidarité mais ne modifie guère celui des obligations à terme et conditionnelles. Dans le cas du cautionnement, diverses dispositions confèrent à ce contrat un aspect plus moderne. La principale réforme consiste dans l'accroissement des droits de la caution. L'auteure s'interroge toutefois sur l'opportunité de compléter la réforme en assimilant la caution à un débiteur solidaire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.022
Scholarly communication0.0100.009
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0080.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes Cahiers de droit→Same topicSocial Sciences and Governance→French-language works237,207→