Praxis reflexiva en los espacios virtuales de formación
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reflective praxis is advocated within the current formative context to the benefit of both the quality of practice and the trainers’ own self concept. Action is the main formative tool; it must be understood from its own autonomy and from the representation that teacher educators build upon it. Two main perspectives are offered: the perspective of individual action and the perspective of the action mediated by the inter-subjective relationship and by practice. The reflective praxis becomes an imperative given the cultural contingency posed by the information and communication technologies. The understanding between practices-in and practices-with is differentiated to point out that formative action is always an action mediated by technology. It is also highlighted that it is in the comprehension of practice where the epistemological continuity between theory and practice takes place. Theory provides the rational scaffolding from which the creativity in practices is built.
 Key words: Reflective praxis. Information and communication technologies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it