MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966451308 · doi:10.1016/s0034-7094(11)70038-1

Non-Invasive Monitoring Based on Bioreactance Reveals Significant Hemodynamic Instability during Elective Cesarean Delivery under Spinal Anesthesia

2011· article· en· W1966451308 on OpenAlexaff
Anne M. Doherty, Yayoi Ohashi, Kristi Downey, Jose C. A. Carvalho

Bibliographic record

VenueBrazilian Journal of Anesthesiology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHemodynamicsPhenylephrineBlood pressureAnesthesiaHeart rateSpinal anesthesiaInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Blood pressure monitoring offers a limited understanding of the hemodynamic consequences of spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. The purpose of this study was to assess, with the aid of a non-invasive cardiac output monitor based on bioreactance, the hemodynamic changes during elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia in which intermittent boluses of phenylephrine were used to prevent and treat hypotension. This observational study was conducted with the Research Ethics Board approval, and all participants provided written informed consent. Healthy patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were enrolled. Intermittent boluses of phenylephrine were administered in an attempt to maintain systolic blood pressure at baseline levels, and patients were assessed with a non-invasive cardiac output monitor based on bioreactance. Hemodynamic data was collected continuously at baseline, and during the postspinal and postdelivery periods. Data was analyzed using a mixed model ANOVA, and a p < 0.05 was considered significant. Systolic blood pressure was maintained within 79.2 ± 14.2 and 105.8 ± 10.0 percent of baseline during the postspinal period, and 78.4 ± 11.3 and 100.9 ± 10.7 percent of baseline in the postdelivery period (mean ± SD) There were significant fluctuations in systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and cardiac output during the postspinal period, and significant fluctuations in systolic blood pressure and cardiac output in the postdelivery period. A new non-invasive monitor based on bioreactance reveals significant hemodynamic fluctuations during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia, despite attempts to maintain blood pressure at baseline levels with intermittent boluses of phenylephrine. O monitoramento da pressão arterial oferece uma compreensão limitada das consequências hemodinâmicas da raquianestesia para cesariana. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar, com o auxílio do monitor de débito cardíaco não invasivo baseado na biorreatância, as alterações hemodinâmicas durante cesariana eletiva sob raquianestesia, na qual doses intermitentes de fenilefrina foram utilizados para prevenir e tratar a hipotensão. Este estudo observacional foi realizado após aprovação da comissão de ética na pesquisa e assinatura do consentimento informado. Pacientes saudáveis marcadas para cesariana eletiva sob raquianestesia foram avaliadas. Doses intermitentes de fenilefrina foram administrados para manter a pressão arterial sistólica nos níveis basais e as pacientes foram avaliadas com o monitor de débito cardíaco não invasivo baseado na biorreatância. Os dados hemodinâmicos foram colhidos continuamente no momento basal e durante os períodos pós-raquianestesia e pós-nascimento do feto. Os dados foram analisados usando ANOVA para modelos mistos e um p < 0,05 foi considerado significativo. A pressão arterial sistólica foi mantida entre 79,2% ± 14,2 e 105,9% ± 10,0 dos valores basais durante o período pós-raquianestesia e 78,4% ± 11,13 e 100,9% ± 10,7 dos valores basais no período pós-nascimento do feto (média ± DP). Flutuações significativas foram observadas na pressão arterial sistólica, frequência cardíaca e débito cardíaco no período pós-nascimento. Um novo monitor não invasivo, baseado na biorreatância, revelou flutuações hemodinâmicas significativas durante a cesariana sob raquianestesia, a despeito das tentativas de manter a pressão arterial nos níveis basais com doses intermitentes de fenilefrina. La monitorización de la presión arterial ofrece una comprensión limitada de las consecuencias hemodinámicas de la raquianestesia para la cesárea. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar, con la ayuda del monitor de débito cardíaco no invasivo y con base en la biorreactancia, las alteraciones hemodinámicas durante la cesárea electiva bajo raquianestesia, en la cual bolos intermitentes de fenilefrina fueron utilizados para prevenir y tratar la hipotensión. Este estudio observacional fue realizado posterior a la aprobación de la comisión de ética en investigación y de la firma del consentimiento informado. Se evaluaron los pacientes sanos con cesárea electiva programada bajo raquianestesia. Bolos intermitentes de fenilefrina fueron administrados para mantener la presión arterial sistólica en los niveles basales, y las pacientes fueron evaluadas con la ayuda del monitor de débito cardíaco no invasivo con base en la biorreactancia. Los datos hemodinámicos se recopilaron continuamente en el momento basal y durante los períodos postraquianestesia y después del nacimiento del feto. Los datos se analizaron usando ANOVA para modelos mixtos, y un p < 0,05 fue considerado significativo. La presión arterial sistólica se mantuvo entre 79,2 (14,2) y 105,9 (10,0) por ciento de los valores basales durante el período postraquianestesia, y 78,4 (11,13) y 100,9 (10,7) por ciento de los valores basales en el período postparto promedio ± de. Las fluctuaciones significativas se observaron en la presión arterial sistólica, en la frecuencia cardíaca y en el débito cardíaco en el período postparto. Un nuevo monitor no invasivo, con base en la biorreactancia, reveló fluctuaciones hemodinámicas significativas durante la cesárea bajo la raquianestesia, pese a los intentos de mantener la presión arterial a niveles basales con bolos intermitentes de fenilefrina.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrazilian Journal of AnesthesiologySame topicHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyFrench-language works237,207