MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966473352 · doi:10.1002/cjce.21698

Phenomenological‐based kinetics modelling of dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene to styrene over a Mg<sub>3</sub>Fe<sub>0.25</sub>Mn<sub>0.25</sub>Al<sub>0.5</sub> hydrotalcite catalyst

2012· article· en· W1966473352 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Mohammad M. Hossain, Luqman Atanda, S. Al‐Khattaf

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicCatalysts for Methane Reforming
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology
KeywordsDehydrogenationEthylbenzeneCatalysisKineticsStyreneActivation energyChemistryThermodynamicsChemical kineticsPhysical chemistryReaction mechanismMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryPolymerCopolymerPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This communication reports a mechanism‐based kinetics modelling for the dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene to styrene (ST) using Mg 3 Fe 0.25 Mn 0.25 Al 0.5 catalyst. Physicochemical characterisation of the catalyst indicates that the presence of basic sites Mg 2+ O 2− on the catalysts along with Fe 3+ is responsible for the catalytic activity. The kinetics experiments are developed using a CREC Fluidised Riser Simulator. Based on the experimental observations and the possible mechanism of the various elementary steps, Langmuir–Hinshelwood type kinetics model are developed. To take into account of the possible catalyst deactivation a reactant conversion‐based deactivation function is also introduced into the model. Parameters are estimated by fitting of the experimental data implemented in MATLAB. Results show that one site type Langmuir–Hinshelwood model appropriately describes the experimental data, with adequate statistical fitting indicators and also satisfied the thermodynamic restraints. The estimated heat of adsorptions of EB (64 kJ/mole) is comparable to the values available in the literature. The activation energy for the formation of ST (85.5 kJ/mole) found to be significantly lower than that of the cracking product benzene (136.6 kJ/mole). These results are highly desirable in order to achieve high selectivity of the desired product ST. © 2012 Canadian Society for Chemical Engineering

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicCatalysts for Methane ReformingFrench-language works237,207