MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966493818 · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2005.07.010

Effect of reaction kinetics on amplification of input temperature perturbations in a packed-bed reactor: Comparison of CO-oxidation on <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" altimg="si39.gif" display="inline" overflow="scroll"><mml:mi>Pt</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math> and on <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" altimg="si40.gif" display="inline" overflow="scroll"><mml:mi>CuO</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math>

2005· article· lv· W1966493818 on OpenAlexaff
V. Z. Yakhnin, Michael Menzinger

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Engineering Science · 2005
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCatalytic Processes in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAccelerationKineticsDispersion (optics)Packed bedChemical kineticsChemistryThermodynamicsPhysical chemistryChemical engineeringAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials sciencePhysicsOrganic chemistryChromatographyEngineeringOpticsClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.828
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.006
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0050.009
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0100.008
Research integrity0.0090.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8310.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueChemical Engineering ScienceSame topicCatalytic Processes in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207