MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966494577 · doi:10.1017/s0022215109990764

Intracranial hypertension secondary to sigmoid sinus compression by group A streptococcal epidural abscess

2009· review· en· W1966494577 on OpenAlexaff
Jeffrey P. Lüdemann, Kenneth J. Poskitt, Ash Singhal

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Laryngology & Otology · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSinusitis and nasal conditions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSigmoid sinusMedicineSurgeryAbscessEpidural abscessSinus (botany)Thrombosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: We present an extremely rare case of severe intracranial hypertension secondary to sigmoid sinus compression by a group A streptococcal epidural abscess. METHOD: Case report and review of the world literature. RESULTS: A five-year-old boy was treated for acute otitis media and group A streptococcal bacteraemia, but subsequently developed severe intracranial hypertension. Computed tomography revealed that, although the sigmoid sinuses were not thrombosed, the patient had a dominant right sigmoid sinus that was almost completely compressed by a small epidural abscess. After surgical decompression of the epidural abscess, with aggressive debridement of the granulation tissue from the sigmoid sinus wall, the patient awoke from general anaesthesia with complete resolution of his symptoms and signs of intracranial hypertension. He suffered no sequelae over the subsequent six months' follow up. CONCLUSION: This is the first reported case of intracranial hypertension due to an epidural abscess causing sigmoid sinus compression without thrombosis. This case illustrates the fact that, even in the absence of thrombosis of the sigmoid sinus, a small epidural abscess may require urgent surgical treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Laryngology & OtologySame topicSinusitis and nasal conditionsFrench-language works237,207