A conceptual analysis of halal beef value chain and market potential in Nigeria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It has been observed that many literatures on halal products and Muslim population in Africa tend to concentrate on North African countries such as Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco, Tunisia or that of South Africa which has less than 2 million Muslims. But Nigeria with more than 50 million Muslim population is ignored surprisingly. This paper attempts to address this seeming anomaly by providing factual insights into the market potential of halal beef in Nigeria. It reviews relevant literatures on halal products, Muslim population and demand through in–depth conceptual analysis on the materials obtained. The analysis shows that Nigeria promises to be a lucrative halal market in Africa due to its population. Its market potential is by far more than South Africa and Saudi Arabia put together. In fact, with a population of over 9 million, Kano State of Nigeria has a halal market potential higher than that of South Africa, Germany, UK, Italy, Brazil and Canada put together. As such Nigeria can be regarded as halal market goldmine that is lying untapped. What is needed is for halal beef processing companies to come and explore the halal market goldmine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".