MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966520798 · doi:10.1080/07060660009500477

Phytotoxicité de huit mycotoxines associées à la fusariose de l'épi chez le blé

2000· article· fr· W1966520798 on OpenAlexaffvenue
François Eudes, A. Comeau, S. Rioux, J. Collin

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology · 2000
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalLethbridge CollegeAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiacetoxyscirpenolTrichotheceneColeoptileToxinMycotoxinZearalenonePhytotoxicityFusariumPhytotoxinChemistryBiologyBotanyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study of eight mycotoxins from Fusarium spp. at concentrations ranging from 0 to 4.3 mg/L for deoxynivalenol, 3-acetyldeoxynivalenol, nivalnol, and a culture filtrate, and from 0 to 14.3 mg/L for T2 toxin, HT2 toxin, diacetoxyscirpenol, and zearalenone, demonstrate that trichothecenes are phytotoxic. The inhibition of coleoptile elongation by each trichothecene is well described by a linear equation and these compounds show differences in phytotoxicity. Deoxynivalenol and 3-acetyldeoxynivalenol are 2.5 times more toxic than T2 toxin, 8 times more toxic than HT2 toxin, and 13 times more toxic than diacetoxyscirpénol. The culture filtrate, which contains deoxynivalenol and 3-acetyldeoxynivalenol, is the most toxic to the coleoptile. A mixture of four purified trichothecenes, deoxynivalenol, 3-acetyldeoxynivalenol, T2 toxin, and nivalénol, revealed differences in trichothecene susceptibility among 11 wheat cultivars. Moreover, reduction of coleoptile elongation of these cultivars was correlated with scabsusceptibility (r = 0.74; P = 0.0068).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.540
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant PathologySame topicMycotoxins in Agriculture and FoodFrench-language works237,207