MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966521082 · doi:10.3139/217.1728

Measurement and Prediction of Temperature Distribution in an Injection Molding Cavity

2003· article· en· W1966521082 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Polymer Processing · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInjection Molding Process and Properties
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceMoldThermocoupleTemperature measurementMolding (decorative)Measure (data warehouse)Composite materialHeat transferCooling curveTransient (computer programming)MechanicsThermodynamicsMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A method to measure the melt temperature distribution in an injection mold cavity is developed. A thermocouple is used in the construction of a sensor with a tip that can be adjusted at different depths of a mold cavity, to measure temperature profiles at different positions in the mold. Polymer temperature distributions are measured and factors affecting temperatures and the key variables that influence distributions are determined. Measurements are compared with temperatures obtained from numerical simulation of the injection molding process using a three-dimensional heat transfer analysis. Although showing lower values and generally higher cooling rates, temperature data measured from the mold cavity indicate similar behavior to predicted transient temperature distributions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.225
Threshold uncertainty score0.361

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it