MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966533816 · doi:10.1137/110843137

A Structure-Preserving Curve for Symplectic Pairs and Its Applications

2012· article· en· W1966533816 on OpenAlexaff
Yueh‐Cheng Kuo, Shih-Feng Shieh

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsSymplectic geometryParameterized complexityMonotonic functionNumerical analysisFixed-point iterationConvergence (economics)Newton's methodHermitian matrixPositive-definite matrixMatrix (chemical analysis)Mathematical analysisFixed pointApplied mathematicsEigenvalues and eigenvectorsPure mathematicsCombinatoricsNonlinear system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main purpose of this paper is the study of numerical methods for the maximal solution of the matrix equation $X+A^*X^{-1}A = Q$, where $Q$ is Hermitian positive definite. We construct a smooth curve parameterized by $t\ge 1$ of symplectic pairs with a special structure, in which the curve passes through all iteration points generated by the known numerical methods, including the fixed-point iteration, the structure-preserving doubling algorithm (SDA), and Newton's method provided that $A^*Q^{-1}A=AQ^{-1}A^*$. In the theoretical section, we give a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of this structure-preserving curve for each parameter $t\ge1$. We also study the monotonicity and boundedness properties of this curve. In the application section, we use this curve to measure the convergence rates of those numerical methods. Numerical results illustrating these solutions are also presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and ApplicationsSame topicMatrix Theory and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207