MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966542306 · doi:10.1155/2015/342428

An Adaptive Linearized Method for Localizing Video Endoscopic Capsule Using Weighted Centroid Algorithm

2015· article· en· W1966542306 on OpenAlexafffund
Umma Hany, Khan A. Wahid

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaBangladesh University of Engineering and TechnologyUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsComputer sciencePath lossAlgorithmCentroidPath (computing)Capsule endoscopyMinimum mean square errorTransmitterPosition (finance)Antenna (radio)Artificial intelligenceMathematicsWirelessTelecommunicationsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Video Capsule Endoscope (VCE) sends images of abnormalities in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. While the physicians receive these images, they have little idea of their exact location which is needed for proper treatment. The proposed localization system consists of a 3D antenna array (with 8 receiver sensors) and one transmitter embedded inside the electronic capsule. We propose an adaptive linearized method of localization using Weighted Centroid Localization (WCL) where the position is calculated by averaging the weighted sum of the reference positions. In our proposed system, first we identify the path loss attenuation exponents using linear least square regression of the collected data (RSSI versus distance). Then the path loss model is linearized to minimize the path loss deviation which is mainly caused due to the nonhomogeneous environment of radio propagation. Then the instantaneous path loss (PL) measured by the sensors is attenuated to the above linearized model and considered as the weight of the sensors to find the location of the capsule using WCL. Finally a calibration process is applied using linear least square regression. To assess the performance, we model the path loss and implement the algorithm in Matlab for 2,530 possible positions with a resolution of 1 mm. The results show that the algorithm achieves high localization accuracy compared with other related methods when simulated using a 3D small intestine model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Distributed Sensor NetworksSame topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207