MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966548245 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2014-0536

Reconstruction of modified <i>f</i>(<i>R</i>, <i>T</i>) with Λ(<i>T</i>) gravity in general class of Bianchi cosmological models

2014· article· en· W1966548245 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anirudh Pradhan, Nasr Ahmed, Bijan Saha

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJoint Institute for Nuclear Research
KeywordsPhysicsClass (philosophy)Mathematical physicsCosmological modelTheoretical physicsCosmologyAstrophysicsEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new class of cosmological models in f(R, T) modified theories of gravity (Harko et al. Phys. Rev. D, 84, 024020 (2011)) where the gravitational Lagrangian is given by an arbitrary function of Ricci scalar R and the trace of the stress–energy tensor T, have been investigated for a specific choice of f(R, T) = f 1 (R) + f 2 (T) in a general class of Bianchi universe. Our intention is to reconstruct f(R, T) models inspired by this special law for the deceleration parameter (Akarsu and Dereli. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 51, 612 (2012)), which is linear in time with negative slope in connection with the theories of modified gravity. In the present study we consider the cosmological constant Λ as a function of the trace of the stress energy–momentum tensor, and such a model is nicknamed “Λ(T) gravity”. Such models may exhibit better consistency with the recent cosmological observations. We analyze the variation of pressure, energy density, and cosmological terms with cosmic time and discuss their physical consequences. We also discuss physical and geometric properties of derived models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.424

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesFrench-language works237,207