MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966608860 · doi:10.1049/iet-cta.2012.0987

Closed‐loop design of fault detection for networked non‐linear systems with mixed delays and packet losses

2013· article· en· W1966608860 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Control Theory and Applications · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Network packetComputer scienceFault detection and isolationClosed loopLoop (graph theory)Fault (geology)Control engineeringEngineeringActuatorMathematicsControl (management)Computer networkArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study is concerned with the problem of fault detection (FD) for networked control systems with discrete and infinite distributed delays subject to random packet losses and non‐linear perturbation. Both sensor‐to‐controller and controller‐to‐actuator packet losses are modelled as two different mutually independent Bernoulli distributed white sequences with known conditional probability distributions. By utilising an observer‐based fault detection filter (FDF) as a residual generator, the FD for networked non‐linear systems with mixed delays and packet losses is formulated as an H ∞ model‐matching problem. Attention is focused on designing the FDF in the closed‐loop system setup such that the estimation error between the residuals and filtered faults is made as small as possible and at the same time the closed‐loop networked non‐linear system is exponentially stable in the mean‐square sense. To show the superiority and effectiveness of this work, two numerical examples are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score0.509

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it