Results of a User Survey to Determine Needs for a Health Sciences Library Renovation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Health Sciences Library (HSL) at the University of Calgary serves the faculties of Medicine, Veterinary Medicine, and Nursing, and is the library for the staff, physicians, and patients of the Foothills Hospital. In August 2008, HSL was approached by the Faculty of Medicine requesting a significant portion of library space to accommodate an increase in undergraduate medical student enrollment. Despite initial concerns that the reduction of library space would be detrimental to all clients, the proposed changes actually benefited both parties involved. The Faculty of Medicine needed a lecture theatre, two 50-seat classrooms, and six small group rooms; whereas the library required a renovation to better accommodate the technological demands of current students and to provide a new learning-conducive environment for future generations of students, faculty, healthcare providers, and patients. To ensure that the HSL renovation met the needs of our clients, a brief opinion survey of five open-ended questions was designed and administered via electronic mail to all staff, students, and faculty served by HSL. In all, 170 survey responses were received. While comments made supported key themes discovered from the literature, they also provided HSL with a new perspective, resulting in design changes to better meet clients' needs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.015 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it