Microwave and ultrasound imaging for biomedical tissue identification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Microwave tomography (MWT) and ultrasound tomography (UT) are two biomedical imaging modalities which are currently being investigated for applications such as breast cancer imaging. In MWT, the object of interest (OI) is surrounded by a number of antennas that are used to radiate the OI successively with electromagnetic waves in the microwave frequency range. The scattered electric fields are collected at receiver locations surrounding the OI. On the other hand, in UT the OI is surrounded by several ultrasound transducers illuminating the OI by acoustic waves and the scattered pressure from the OI is then collected at the receivers. In both MWT and UT, the scattered data is given to an inverse scattering algorithm to reconstruct specific properties of the object: in MWT the relative permittivity and conductivity (or complex permittivity) of the OI are reconstructed, whereas in UT the complex compressibility and inverse density are reconstructed. Both are quantitative imaging methods and thereby provide some insight into type of tissue corresponding to a pixel value in the image.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".