MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966683500 · doi:10.5380/rfdufpr.v41i0.38313

LA REFLEXION PREVENTIVE DE HABERMAS SUR LA TECHNIQUE GENETIQUE

2004· article· pt· W1966683500 on OpenAlexaff
Henri Mbulu

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR · 2004
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyObject (grammar)SociologyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O artigo procura reformar a argumentação de Habernas, a respeito do que eledenominou “engenismo liberal”, ou seja, a possibilidade de os pais determinarem intervenções no genoma das células geminais fecundadas. O autor aprofunda a discussão ética sobre as conseqüências eugênicas de tais intervenções apontadas por Habernas e revela a perplexidade do filósofo diante das insuficiências das respostas normativas a essa questão.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.026
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.069
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score0.137

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0260.069
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.024
Scholarly communication0.0080.008
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0130.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista da Faculdade de Direito UFPRSame topicReproductive Health and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207