MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966689363 · doi:10.1080/00221686.2014.950611

<i>In situ</i>spatially distributed field measurements of transverse dispersion of a wastewater effluent in an extended natural meandering river

2014· article· en· W1966689363 on OpenAlexaffabout
Abolghasem Pilechi, Colin D. Rennie, Abdolmajid Mohammadian, David Z. Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hydraulic Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutfallTRACERAcoustic Doppler current profilerGeologyHydrology (agriculture)Mixing (physics)Temporal resolutionVector fieldField (mathematics)Environmental scienceCurrent (fluid)Geotechnical engineeringMechanicsOceanographyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new in situ technique is introduced and tested for the field tracer study in meandering rivers. Real-time position data from a global positioning system were integrated with in situ fluorometer data, thereby providing a 2D spatial distribution of the tracer concentration. The method was used in an intensive tracer field survey over an 83 km reach of the North Saskatchewan River downstream of the capital region wastewater treatment plant. Hydrodynamics data were also collected simultaneously by measuring streamwise water velocity and depth using an acoustic Doppler current profiler. The full mixing length for this surface bank outfall at the observed low flow condition was inferred to be 130 km. The employed technique effectively improved the understanding of mixing patterns in complex flows by providing tracer and hydrodynamic data with high spatial and temporal resolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.362

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hydraulic ResearchSame topicHydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesFrench-language works237,207