MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1966712895 · doi:10.1117/12.446623

<title>Attenuated total reflection modulator based on surface plasmon excitation</title>

2001· article· en· W1966712895 on OpenAlexaff
M. Karppinen, Robert Charbonneau, Pierre Berini

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNokia FoundationSuomen Kulttuurirahasto
KeywordsMaterials scienceTotal internal reflectionAttenuated total reflectionOpticsPrismRefractive indexOptoelectronicsModulation (music)Surface plasmon polaritonPolymerThin filmOptical modulatorSurface plasmonPlasmonAngle of incidence (optics)Intensity modulationDielectricBeam (structure)ExcitationPhase modulationNanotechnologyElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate an attenuated total internal reflection (ATR) modulator, which can be fabricated by depositing an ultra-thin Au film, an electro-optic (EO) polymer film and an Au electrode on a prism. At a certain incidence angle, the incoming TM-polarized beam can excite a surface-plasmon wave (SPW) propagating at the metal-polymer interface. The intensity modulation of the reflected beam is possible because of the sensitivity of the coupling efficiency to the refractive index of the polymer. An alternative design uses a thin dielectric film between the prism and the Au film but gave no better results. The device potentially provides low fabrication cost and very high frequency operation, and the polymer losses are not a significant issue. A modulator structure was optimized with simulations to achieve maximum modulation depth. The optimal thicknesses were in the range of 30 to 35 nm and 1 micrometers for the Au and polymer films, respectively. Nevertheless, the achievable modulation depth is rather small even with polymers of high EO coefficient and the operation of the device is sensitive, especially, to the incidence angle as well as to the polymer thickness due to the coupling of two SPW modes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE→Same topicPhotonic and Optical Devices→French-language works237,207→