MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966727134 · doi:10.1115/detc2010-28458

Integration of TRIZ and Virtual Environments for Hemp Scutcher Design

2010· article· en· W1966727134 on OpenAlexaff
Jinke Xu, Qingjin Peng, Ying Chen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDesign Education and Practice
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTRIZVisualizationComputer scienceConceptual designVirtual realityHuman–computer interactionProduct designVirtual machineProduct (mathematics)Systems engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TRIZ method provides useful theory for users to analyze and solve problems using a logic manner. It is widely used in different fields and has gained great success in machine design. Virtual reality (VR) is a computer generated environment with features of visualization and users’ interaction, which provides a cost-effective tool for product evaluation and design improvement. In this research, TRIZ is applied in the design of a new hemp scutcher prototype. With the assistance of VR technology, the design visualization and concept evolution are achieved in a virtual environment. A VR-based system is developed to evaluate the mechanism of the conceptual design, and to compare differences with traditional machines. The new design is supposed to have a better performance in terms of scale, product quality and energy efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDesign Education and PracticeFrench-language works237,207