MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966735560 · doi:10.1117/12.2002548

Wavelength tunable GHz repetition rate picosecond pulse generator using an SBS frequency comb

2013· article· en· W1966735560 on OpenAlexaff
Victor Lambin Iezzi, Sébastien Loranger, Raman Kashyap

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Fiber Laser Technologies
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpticsBrillouin scatteringPicosecondMaterials scienceWavelengthFiber laserLaserFrequency combPulse (music)OptoelectronicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have developed a new system to generate GHz repetition rate tunable pulses in the picosecond regime at any wavelength by using self-phase-locked stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS). The phase-locked comb at any required wavelength is generated using a single length of fiber in a ring cavity, seeded by an amplified single frequency CW pump laser. We demonstrate a coherent phase relationship between multiple cascaded Stokes waves in the cavity, which directly leads to a highly stable pulse regime. This scheme does not require the matching of frequency components to the cavity, as the frequency components are generated by SBS and not oscillating modes. The coherent pulses in the time domain are in the order of ~10 ps. The nature of the fiber leads to a stable SBS frequency shift, which is directly correlated to the repetition frequency and which is in the order of tens of GHz. Since the process is governed by SBS, it is self-starting and has a linear dependence with temperature (1 MHz/°C), which could be used for fine adjustments. Such a laser is therefore suitable for high-speed optical clocks and optical communication system, amongst other applications. This system allows the ultra-short pulses to be generated at any wavelength by simply tuning the wavelength of the seed laser. The pump power allows the pulse width to be tuned in steps, by generating additional Stokes orders. The repetition rate is altered by the choice of fiber cavity or by the choice of the orders of the SBS shifted frequencies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicAdvanced Fiber Laser TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207