MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966745759 · doi:10.1130/b31039.1

Interactions between axial and transverse drainage systems in the Late Cretaceous Cordilleran foreland basin: Evidence from detrital zircons in the Straight Cliffs Formation, southern Utah, USA

2014· article· en· W1966745759 on OpenAlexaff
T. S. Szwarc, Cari L. Johnson, Lisa Stright, Christopher McFarlane

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society of America Bulletin · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyFluvialForeland basinZirconPaleontologyCretaceousProterozoicStructural basinGeomorphologyGeochemistryTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New detrital zircon geochronologic data from the Straight Cliffs Formation of southern Utah provide insight into the controls on stratigraphic architecture of the Western Interior Basin during Turonian-early Campanian time.Detrital zircon ages (N = 40, n = 3650) derived from linked fl uvial and shallow-marine depositional systems of the Kaiparowits Plateau indicate the majority of zircons in fl uvial strata were derived from the Mogollon Highlands (1.25-1.90Ga, 67% of fl uvial zircons), with subordinate contributions delivered from the Sevier fold-andthrust belt (265-1250 Ma, 17%) and Cordilleran magmatic sources (81-265 Ma, 16%).Integration of these data with fl uvial facies distributions, petrography, clast counts, and evidence of magmatic arc sources from the Mohave region of California implies the presence of a northeast-fl owing, axial fl uvial system.This system was fed by rivers draining the Mogollon Highlands to the south and by transverse drainages from the Sevier fold-and-thrust belt to the west.Compared to the fl uvial deposits, shallow-marine sandstones have a greater proportion of Sevier fold-and-thrust belt-derived zircons (42%), which were delivered via longshore currents from the north.Shallow-marine samples also contain less Mogollon input (44%) compared to contemporaneous fl uvial systems, and similar input from the magmatic arc (14%).Although Proterozoic zircons associated with the Mogollon Highlands are also present in the Sevier fold-and-thrust belt, several lines of evidence argue for a distinct southerly source for the Straight Cliffs Formation.These include (1) moderate proportions of feldspar and angular quartz grains in fl uvial sandstones, which favor a felsic intrusive source, and (2) prominent 1.4 and 1.7 Ga zircon populations.The 1.4 and 1.7 Ga peaks are the only dominant Proterozoic peaks in samples from the Straight Cliffs Formation, whereas samples derived more directly from the Sevier fold-and-thrust belt tend to have a broader distribution of Proterozoic age peaks.Up-section architectural trends in the Straight Cliffs Formation are linked to trends in detrital zircon geochronologic data, underscoring the likelihood of common drivers and controls.The axial system depositing Straight Cliffs fl uvial strata was primarily fed by drainages originating in the Mogollon Highlands during a pulse of tectonic activity in the Maria fold-and-thrust belt and generally high subsidence rates in the foreland basin (Turonian-Santonian).Over time, activation of the Paxton duplex in the Sevier fold-and-thrust belt (early Campanian) exhumed proximal foreland basin strata and enabled drainage systems from the Sevier fold-and-thrust belt to feed into the basin more prominently.The results presented here underscore the potential signifi cance of axial fl uvial systems and their complex interplay with transverse drainage networks in foreland basins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.232
Threshold uncertainty score0.462

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society of America BulletinSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207