Participation of prostaglandin E2 in the endothelial protective effect of ischaemic preconditioning in isolated rat heart
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the protective effect of ischaemic preconditioning (IPC) on endothelial function in coronary arteries of the rat involves prostaglandins. METHODS: Isolated rat hearts perfused under constant flow conditions were exposed to 30 min of partial ischaemia (flow-rate 1 ml/min) followed by 20 min of reperfusion, after which coronaries were precontracted with U-46619 0.1 microM, and the coronary response to the endothelium-dependent vasodilator, serotonin (5-HT, 10 microM), was compared to that of the endothelium-independent vasodilator, sodium nitroprusside (SNP, 3 microM). Prostaglandin production was blocked with a perfusion of indomethacin 10 microM started 15 min before IPC or a corresponding sham period and stopped just before the 20-min reperfusion period. RESULTS: In untreated hearts, ischaemia diminished selectively 5-HT-induced vasodilatation, compared to sham hearts. The vasodilatation by SNP was unaffected after ischaemia and reperfusion. IPC (5 min of zero-flow ischaemia followed by 10 min reperfusion before the 30-min partial ischaemia) preserved the vasodilatation produced by 5-HT. Enzymeimmunoassays showed an increased production of PGE2 in the IPC group. Treatment of hearts with indomethacin blocked the protective effect of IPC on the vasodilatation produced by 5-HT and decreased the production of PGE2. A 5-min perfusion with 3 nM PGE2 started 15 min before the partial ischaemia, protected the endothelium. This was blocked by 1 microM chelerythrine, but not by 0.3 microM glibenclamide. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that IPC affords protection to endothelial function in coronary arteries of the rat partially via the release of PGE2. Under our experimental conditions, the protective effect of PGE2 is mediated by PKC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".