MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966762143 · doi:10.3917/riges.302.0035

Introduction. La mobilisation des troupes : quoi, pourquoi et comment?

2005· article· fr· W1966762143 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Michel Tremblay

Bibliographic record

VenueGestion · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Établir un climat mobilisateurQuel est le contexte le plus propice à la mobilisation?Existe-t-il un climat spécifique de mobilisation?Quels sont les principaux facteurs de mobilisation?Quel est le processus menant à la mobilisation?Telles sont les grandes questions auxquelles l'article de Tremblay et Simard tente de répondre.S'inspirant largement des travaux menés sur les échanges sociaux, les auteurs proposent un cadre conceptuel de la mobilisation.Selon Tremblay et Simard, la mobilisation se construit et se développe dans un contexte d'échanges

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.113

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0060.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueGestionSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207