MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W19667788 · doi:10.12927/hcq.2009.20978

Esquema de selección de sementales caprinos de aptitud lechera de raza murciano-granadina

2005· article· en· W19667788 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J. Quiróz, J.M. Lozano, José Manuel León Jurado, Juan Vicente Delgado Bermejo

Bibliographic record

VenueDialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHistorical and socio-economic studies of Spain and related regions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyPet therapyAnimal scienceAnatomyAnimal welfareEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Se describe el esquema de selección aprobado para la Asociación Nacional de Criadores de Caprino de Raza Murciano Granadina. El esquema establece una organización piramidal de las ganaderías, clasificándolas en tres estratos: núcleo selectivo, segundo estrato y población no controlada. El desarrollo del mismo consta de tres fases: la primera es común a los dos primeros estratos por desarrollarse exclusivamente a nivel intra-rebaño, consistente en la selección de las madres de candidatos de futuros sementales. La segunda, también intra-rebaño, consiste en la evaluación individual de los candidatos a futuro semental. En la tercera, las ganaderías de segundo estrato realizan una evaluación anual de sus sementales activos y de los nuevos candidatos; mientras que las ganaderías del núcleo selectivo pueden evaluar sus machos a nivel inter-rebaño al encontrarse conectadas genéticamente. Los objetivos selectivos se centran en mejorar la producción lechera, atendiendo a criterios de producción de leche, proteína y grasa en lactaciones de 210 y 240 días, además del morfotipo lechero.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)Same topicHistorical and socio-economic studies of Spain and related regionsFrench-language works237,207