Modeling the Action of an Antitumor Drug: A Density Functional Theory Study of the Mechanism of Tirapazamine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Density functional theory methods are employed to investigate experimentally proposed mechanisms by which the antitumor drug tirapazamine may react with a DNA sugar-C(1)' radical to give the sugar derivative deoxyribonolactone, with concomitant DNA strand breakage. For the previously proposed minor pathway, ionization of the sugar-C(1)' radical by tirapazamine, the calculated ionization energy, and the electron affinity of the models of the sugar-C(1)' radical of DNA and tirapazamine suggest that tirapazamine must be protonated to be able to oxidize the sugar-C(1)' radical. The preferred mechanism for reaction of tirapazamine with a sugar-C(1)' radical, in agreement with experimental observations, is found to proceed by direct attack of an N-oxide oxygen of tirapazamine at the sugar-C(1)' position, followed by homolytic cleavage of the N-O bond of the drug moiety. Possible alternative mechanisms are also investigated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".