The Relationship of Biblical Studies to the History of Religions School, with Reference to the Scientific Study ofReligion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Theologians both Catholic and Protestant have consistently assumed theology to be related to the Church. This reflects the idea that theology is a confessional discipline. In Germany the close binding of theology to the Church was strengthened after the First World War and persisted through the Nazi era. Since then this bond has in fact underpinned the growing significance of Church development worldwide: The roots of this correlation of Church and theology are found as early as the nineteenth century. Friedrich Schleiermacher (1768-1834) decreed: "Even the scientific activity of the theologian must have for its object the promotion of the Church's welfare-and partakes, therefore, of a clerical character." In a similar vein, Albrecht Ritschl (1822-1889) remarked that "theology is only conceivable as service to the Christian religious community."
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.013 | 0.017 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.056 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".