Les tensions entre la nature et le droit ; vers un droit de la filiation génétiquement déterminé ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À la suite de la réforme du droit de la famille de 1980, l’auteure démontre comment les concepts de sang, de nature et de vérité biologique ont acquis une importance croissante au sein du droit civil de la filiation au Québec, tant en matière de contestation qu’en réclamation de la filiation. En effet, alors qu’en vertu du Code civil du Bas Canada, l’élément biologique ne possédait pas de valeur en soi, celle-ci dépendant de sa reprise par le Juridique, l’article met en relief la manière dont une partie du droit de la filiation s’est peu à peu soumis à la vérité brute de la chair et des gènes. Ainsi, au-delà d’une analyse du discours législatif, jurisprudentiel et doctrinal, c’est la fonction normative du droit face à la réalité des faits que l’auteure interroge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.042 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".